Kylian Mbappé’s winning penalty against Paraguay sent France into the World Cup quarterfinals, but the match has since been overshadowed by a racism row involving Paraguayan senator Celeste Amarilla.
The controversy began after France beat Paraguay 1-0 in Philadelphia in the round of 16. Mbappé scored the only goal from the penalty spot, ending Paraguay’s World Cup run and setting up France’s quarterfinal against Morocco.
What did the Paraguayan senator say about Mbappé?
After the match, Amarilla posted racist comments about Mbappé on social media, targeting his identity and African heritage. Reuters reported that she referred to the France captain as a “colonised Cameroonian,” while other reports said her remarks included broader racial stereotypes and insults.
Amarilla is a senator from Paraguay’s Liberal Radical Party. Her comments drew immediate criticism because they came from an elected official and followed an already tense knockout match between France and Paraguay.
How did Mbappé respond?
Mbappé responded directly on X, accusing Amarilla of racism and saying her comments had damaged the image of Paraguay’s World Cup campaign. The France captain called her a “despicable woman” and said she was unworthy of serving in Congress, according to AP.
He also argued that the senator’s remarks had shifted attention away from Paraguay’s players, who had produced a strong tournament before being eliminated by France.
What action is France taking?
The French Football Federation said it would file a criminal complaint over Amarilla’s remarks, describing them as racist and offensive. The FFF’s response moved the dispute beyond a social media exchange and turned it into a legal and diplomatic issue.
French officials also backed Mbappé. President Emmanuel Macron and other French government figures condemned the remarks, while the Paraguayan government distanced itself from Amarilla’s comments and said they did not reflect the country’s values.
Why did the match become so heated?
France’s 1-0 win over Paraguay was physical and tense. Mbappé converted a second-half penalty after a VAR review, and the game included several confrontations between players. Reports also described a post-match exchange involving Mbappé and Paraguay goalkeeper Orlando Gill.
That tension fed the online reaction after the match, but the backlash against Amarilla has focused on the racist nature of her remarks, not simply on football rivalry.
Why does the Mbappé row matter before France vs Morocco?
The controversy comes as France prepare to face Morocco in the World Cup quarterfinals. Mbappé remains central to France’s campaign, both as captain and as one of the tournament’s leading scorers.
The row also adds another layer to wider debates over racism in football, especially when abuse comes not from anonymous accounts but from a public official. For France, the case has become about defending its captain. For Paraguay, it risks overshadowing a strong World Cup run with an international racism controversy.
What happens next?
France’s legal complaint will determine whether the case moves into formal proceedings. Amarilla has reportedly pushed back and demanded an apology from Mbappé, but the political and football reaction so far has largely sided with the France captain.
For now, Mbappé and France move on to the quarterfinal against Morocco, while the fallout from the senator’s comments continues off the pitch.
add your comment
Terms of publication : Not to offend the writer, people, sacred things, or attack religions or the divine self, and refrain from racist incitement and insults.