A planned parliamentary fact-finding mission aimed at examining Morocco’s livestock import support programs has yet to materialize due to growing tensions between opposition parties and the parliamentary majority, despite the initiative having been approved by the House of Representatives’ Bureau.
The temporary mission was set to investigate the procedures and effectiveness of government efforts to support the importation of cattle, sheep, and meat.
However, opposition parties have withdrawn their participation, arguing the current setup violates internal parliamentary rules and calling for either leadership of the mission or the activation of a full-fledged fact-finding commission.
In an official letter addressed to the Chair of the Productive Sectors Committee, the Party of Progress and Socialism (PPS) caucus stated that it will not take part in the initiative, citing concerns over fairness in its formation. The opposition party had been asked to designate a representative after the mission’s composition was decided through a vote favoring the majority.
Similarly, the Justice and Development Party (PJD) parliamentary group echoed the refusal, saying it would not participate in a mission that it deems “in violation of the House’s internal regulations.”
The Productive Sectors Committee had sent requests to all parliamentary groups, urging them to appoint representatives to the exploratory mission, which was to examine potential irregularities in the importation support mechanisms.
A committee source confirmed receipt of the PPS and PJD’s written refusals, which pose a challenge to the mission’s formation. The source admitted that the stalemate could become a serious obstacle, though expressed hope the issue could be resolved.
“There is no violation of the internal regulations,” the source added, defending the mission’s legality. “What matters is that the process moves forward in a proper way, especially since it received formal approval from the House Bureau.”
The same source expressed disappointment in the opposition’s withdrawal, arguing that objections should have been raised earlier, during the Bureau’s vote on the mission’s establishment.
As the committee awaits responses from other parliamentary groups, the future of the probe remains uncertain.
add your comment
Terms of publication : Not to offend the writer, people, sacred things, or attack religions or the divine self, and refrain from racist incitement and insults.